army1987 comments on Welcome to Less Wrong! (July 2012) - Less Wrong

20 Post author: ciphergoth 18 July 2012 05:24PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (843)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 19 July 2012 11:53:10AM 1 point [-]

WAG

???

The only expansion of that I can find with Google (Wifes And Girlfriends [of footballers]) doesn't seem too relevant.

Comment author: Morendil 19 July 2012 12:13:26PM 7 points [-]

Wild Ass Guess.

Comment author: DaFranker 19 July 2012 02:05:53PM *  3 points [-]

Was that just meta, or did you already know it? In what fields would the saying be more common, out of curiosity?

Comment author: evand 19 July 2012 05:24:51PM 5 points [-]

It's reasonably common among engineers in my experience. Along with SWAG -- scientific wild-assed guessed, intended to denote something that has minimal support -- an estimation that is the output of combining WAGs and actual data, for example.

Comment author: Davidmanheim 19 July 2012 11:44:24PM 2 points [-]

He may not have known it, but it's used. I worked in Catastrophe Risk modeling, and it was a term that applied to what our clients and competitors did; not ourselves, we had rigorous methodologies that were not discussed because they were "trade secrets," or as I came to understand, what is referred to below as SWAG.

I have heard engineers use it as well..