loup-vaillant comments on The Problem Of Apostasy - Less Wrong

10 Post author: Raw_Power 19 July 2012 10:27AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (122)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: asr 25 July 2012 08:32:37PM 0 points [-]

Rising prices without a corresponding rise in income isn't true inflation, it's just squeezing your people to get their juice. But it does somewhat emulate inflation.

I suspect you'll find that you always have slightly different rates of increase for different prices and different incomes. There's no such thing as perfect lockstep increase across an economy. As a result, there will always be somebody who gets hurt. In practice, those people tend to be pensioners, not the middle-aged wealthy.

It occurred to me that our fiscal an monetary systems are horribly complicated, and full of loopholes.

Yes. But that's quite hard to avoid. The world has lots of complicated corner cases that have to be handled. This goes with the territory. When we apply a tax, we generally apply it to "the market value of" an asset or a gift or what-have-you. But "market value" is an abstraction that doesn't perfectly capture the underlying reality. So there are going to be corner cases where somebody profits from the modeling error. I don't see a way to avoid this. Mitigate when possible, yes. Solve, no.

Comment author: loup-vaillant 25 July 2012 10:30:27PM 0 points [-]

I think I agree with what you say here.

Mitigate when possible, yes. Solve, no.

If only we genuinely tried that, it'd be really cool.