pjeby comments on Generalizing From One Example - Less Wrong

259 Post author: Yvain 28 April 2009 10:00PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (386)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: pjeby 29 April 2009 06:18:40PM 0 points [-]

Nothing about position, I used 'background' as a metaphor for something not being attended to.

I understand that; the question was how you made that distinction. Taking your language literally, you said you "pushed" those things to the background. One observation of NLP is that quite often (though not always), people describe their mental processing quite literally, even though their language is "metaphorical".

NLP also observes that if you take those descriptions literally and then perform the same "metaphorical" steps in your own mind, you can often more-or-less reproduce the subjective experience of the other person.

So when I read what you said, I realized that there are times when I more or less literally "push things to the background", but that I had never done so with a song in my head. So it seems worth trying, whether it actually has anything to do with how you push things to the background.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 29 April 2009 06:31:30PM 0 points [-]

Well, the metaphor encompassed that word as well, so "pushing" literally is an incorrect way to put it, more like displacing, as the new object of attention gets almost all of it, other things become less attended to, just because attention is a limited resource.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 06 August 2011 02:24:58PM 0 points [-]

So there's no kinesthetic aspect to the experience?