endoself comments on Game Theory As A Dark Art - Less Wrong

50 Post author: Yvain 24 July 2012 03:27AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (100)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Xachariah 25 July 2012 07:20:27AM *  5 points [-]

And if there were two homo-economicii there, they would have each given MBlume infinity dollars until one of them ran out of cash.

There's a reason humans evolved not to fall into those traps.

Edit: Whoops, brain farted that one. Homo economucii would play a mixed strategy, with a NE of $0 dollars expected gain. Cooperating humans play a strategy where they win $19 every time.

Comment author: endoself 25 July 2012 08:32:47PM 5 points [-]

What? No they wouldn't. Giving MBlume infinity dollars is not a Nash equilibrium.

Comment author: MBlume 26 July 2012 02:20:30AM 10 points [-]

It isn't? Darn =(

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 02 August 2012 04:32:27AM 7 points [-]

I don't see how any one player can do better in a world where MBlume gets infinity dollars.

Comment author: [deleted] 02 August 2012 08:40:55AM 1 point [-]

Even after inflation?