knb comments on Why space stopped captivating minds ? - Less Wrong

10 Post author: kilobug 29 July 2012 09:58AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (54)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: knb 29 July 2012 05:06:05PM 2 points [-]

I don't think the space conquest spirit was ever lost. It seems to me that science-fiction is still largely dominated by space tales. To the extent that enthusiasm has declined, it is largely a product of the stagnation in the technology. There is only so much you can do with chemical rocket engines, and anything beyond LEO (or, at best, the moon) is going to be massively expensive with little real-world payoff. The technology that could take us beyond the moon and inspire people to believe in space travel again would require nuclear engines, which are limited by a strong taboo and international and national regulations against fission devices in orbit.

Comment author: DanArmak 29 July 2012 07:48:29PM *  1 point [-]

You'd think the safest place for nuclear engines would be in space... But of course, "nuclear" is a boo light.

Comment author: kilobug 29 July 2012 08:04:13PM 6 points [-]

Well, I guess the concern is if the rocket blows during take-off, which does happen in a significant percentage of cases, the nuclear material will become nasty fallouts. I've no idea if that threat is serious (we would have to consider the amount of nuclear fuel required, and estimate how bad the fallout would be, and multiply that by that of in-flight explosion), but I understand it can scare some people.