lavalamp comments on Politics Discussion Thread August 2012 - Less Wrong

0 Post author: OrphanWilde 01 August 2012 03:25PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (166)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 01 August 2012 10:58:22PM -2 points [-]

General infrastructure planning tends to be decided on long term efficiency as its not a day to day political issue.

What planet do you live on?

Possibly, but the dead don't tend to pay taxes,

Neither do retirees. Furthermore, anyone with a chronic illness, or anyone who isn't rich for that matter, is a net drain on finances. But this analysis implicitly assumes that governments are run to maximize revenue which is blatantly false, at best some department might have a fixed budget and might try to figure out how to spend it to maximize some metric.

Interestingly the NHS spends a lot of money on people in the final stages of their lives, while they could save a lot money by legalising or enforcing euthanasia

Being that explicit about it would loose them votes; however, at the margin such things do happen.

Comment author: lavalamp 02 August 2012 12:42:34AM 3 points [-]

What planet do you live on?

This is never a convincing argument...

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 02 August 2012 07:58:47PM 1 point [-]

Neither is the raw assertion it was responding to.

Comment author: lavalamp 02 August 2012 11:43:00PM 4 points [-]

You could easily have said something like, "this is not obvious, please provide the evidence which caused you to believe it." FiftyTwo's statement required support, but yours sounded mindkilled. And even if your mind isn't, that sort of statement will make it extremely difficult for an average person to continue having a productive dialog with you.