= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Nisan comments on Rationality Quotes August 2012 - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (426)
-- Oscar Wilde
It is absurd to divide people into charming or tedious. People either have familiar worldviews or unfamiliar worldviews.
It is absurd to divide people into familiar worldviews or unfamiliar worldviews. People either have closer environmental causality or farther environmental causality.
(anyone care to formalize the recursive tower?)
It's absurd to divide people into two categories and expect those two categories to be meaningful in more than a few contexts.
It is absurd to divide people. They tend to die if you do that.
It's absurd to divide. You tend to die if you do that.
It's absurd: You tend to die.
It's absurd to die.
It's bs to die.
Be.
Nobody alive has died yet.
“Males” and “females”. (OK, there are edge cases and stuff, but this doesn't mean the categories aren't meaningful, does it?)
What about good vs bad humans?
Or humans who create paperclips versus those who don't?
I thought I just said that.
Can't their be good humans who don't create paperclips and just destroy antipaperclips and staples and such?
Destroying antipaperclips is creating paperclips.
I didn't know humans had the concept though.
What is an antipaperclip?