CarlShulman comments on [Link] Admitting to Bias - Less Wrong

19 Post author: GLaDOS 10 August 2012 08:13AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (129)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: CarlShulman 11 August 2012 06:32:16PM 13 points [-]

Back in the OB days, iirc, Eliezer referred to the community as mostly libertarian;

Robin and Eliezer both are libertarian-leaning, and participated for a long time (accumulating audiences) in libertarian transhumanist circles such as the Extropians. New audience members aren't primarily attracted through those channels, so the effect should decline with time.

Comment author: magfrump 14 August 2012 09:03:03PM 4 points [-]

New audience members aren't primarily attracted through those channels

This makes me wonder, is there a reason to expect Harry Potter fans to be more liberal than average?

And... yes, I guess there is.

Comment author: BlazeOrangeDeer 16 August 2012 08:51:43AM 2 points [-]

I know of several parents who forbid their children to read the books because of some ridiculous fear of witchcraft, stemming from their conservative fundamentalism... so that would be one factor.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 16 August 2012 07:27:21PM 3 points [-]

Well, reading Harry Potter probably at least marginally increases the child's chances of embracing some form of witchcraft later in life. Whether that's enough to bad the books is a different question.

Comment author: shminux 16 August 2012 08:26:25PM 0 points [-]

Well, reading Harry Potter probably at least marginally increases the child's chances of embracing some form of witchcraft later in life.

Do you mean it as an objective statement or what a certain (probably strongly mainstream-religious) parent would think?

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 16 August 2012 10:51:00PM 5 points [-]

Objective statement. In fact, it strikes me as fairly obvious once one gets past thinking that any argument that even marginally helps the enemy must be wrong.

Comment author: shminux 16 August 2012 11:57:34PM 0 points [-]

Hmm, it does not strike me as obvious. For example, one could advance an argument that reading about witchcraft as fiction at an early age actually inoculates children from believing in the reality of witchcraft later in life. I do not see a way to believe either argument without experimental testing. Maybe some has been done already?

This reminds me of the varying positions religious parents take on Santa Clause and the Tooth Fairy. Some say that such beliefs, bound to be proven false eventually, cause children to doubt their faith in the true God, others say that this highlights the difference between paganism and true beliefs. I am not aware of any studies on the matter.