wedrifid comments on What is moral foundation theory good for? - Less Wrong

9 Post author: novalis 12 August 2012 05:03AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (296)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: roystgnr 14 August 2012 05:39:17AM 2 points [-]

Stipulating agreement: aren't fuzzy categories better than no categories at all? Who was the first ape classifiable as homo erectus, and how distinguishable was he from his homo habilis parents?

Comment author: wedrifid 14 August 2012 06:22:22AM 1 point [-]

Stipulating agreement: aren't fuzzy categories better than no categories at all? Who was the first ape classifiable as homo erectus, and how distinguishable was he from his homo habilis parents?

Oh, I agree with your conclusion---arbitrary categories are great. I'd go as far as to say indefensible (for us, at least).