jacoblyles comments on What is moral foundation theory good for? - Less Wrong

9 Post author: novalis 12 August 2012 05:03AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (296)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: OphilaDros 13 August 2012 11:07:54AM 9 points [-]

the sexual norms based on sacralized individual autonomy end up working very badly in practice, so that we end up with the present rather bizarre situation where we see an unprecedented amount of hand-wringing about all sorts of sex-related problems, and at the same time proud insistence that we have reached unprecedented heights of freedom, enlightenment, and moral superiority in sex-related matters.

The unprecedented amount of hand-wringing might not be indicative of an increase in the number or magnitude of sex-related problems if it turns out that previous norms also discouraged public discussions of such problems. What are the other metrics by which we can say that the current set of norms are working badly in practice? Are there fewer people having sex, are they having less enjoyable sex, or are their sexual relationships less fulfilling and of shorter duration or are these norms destabilising society in other ways?

Comment author: jacoblyles 15 August 2012 10:54:07PM 0 points [-]
Comment author: David_Gerard 17 August 2012 07:59:44AM 1 point [-]
Comment author: jacoblyles 17 August 2012 06:40:37PM *  0 points [-]

I'm pretty sure they are sourced from census data. I check the footnotes on websites like that.