= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Kaj_Sotala comments on Bayes for Schizophrenics: Reasoning in Delusional Disorders - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (154)
Feedback: I thought that this post was interesting and at times quite amusing. However, I didn't upvote (nor downvote) because I felt that the concerns you discussed under the open questions section were serious enough that this post could basically be summed up as "here are some theories which feel like they might be on the right track, but basically we're still clueless".
I want to see more posts that explain the current state of knowledge of interesting rationality-related fields, and that explicitly state what questions are still troubling. Thus I upvoted the post.