duckduckMOO comments on Bayes for Schizophrenics: Reasoning in Delusional Disorders - Less Wrong

88 Post author: Yvain 13 August 2012 07:22PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (154)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: SilasBarta 14 August 2012 10:31:33PM *  5 points [-]

For example, one male patient expressed the worry that his wife was actually someone else, who had somehow contrived to exactly copy his wife's appearance and mannerisms. This delusion sounds harmlessly hilarious ...

It's harmless to claim that someone is observationally equivalent to his wife, but not his wife? When that kind of thing happens on a large scale, it's called "the debate about p-zombies".

Comment author: duckduckMOO 15 August 2012 01:20:49PM 4 points [-]

isn't claimed actual equivalence the problem with P-zombies. Someone being observationally equivalent but different is merely extremely unlikely (maybe she has an identical twin, maybe aliens etc.) P-zombies are supposed to be indistingishable in principle, which is impossible/requires souls that aren't subject to testing for distinguishability.