= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Tuukka_Virtaperko comments on Bayes for Schizophrenics: Reasoning in Delusional Disorders - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (154)
Hehe. I'm a psych patient and I'm allowed to visit LessWrong.
Do you have fascinating delusions you would like to let us try to do Bayes to?
A better phrasing might be to contextualize it from someone else's viewpoint. The person having the "delusions" might not perceive them as such, and might not find them particularly fascinating at all.
I think it was a fair response in context. I did write it tongue-in-cheek.