army1987 comments on How to deal with someone in a LessWrong meeting being creepy - Less Wrong

16 Post author: Douglas_Reay 09 September 2012 04:41AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (769)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 08 September 2012 12:36:16PM 3 points [-]

Well, I was thinking more about street prostitutes than escorts, but what in my comment suggests anything about “my model of prostitution”, anyway?

Comment author: MixedNuts 08 September 2012 12:39:14PM 2 points [-]

"Sexual intimacy" is a thing prostitutes (including low-end ones) provide, which is why they're more expensive than fleshlights.

Comment author: [deleted] 08 September 2012 12:45:28PM *  2 points [-]

Given that Maslow listed it separately from “sex”, I guess he had in mind a narrower sense for “sexual intimacy” than you might have. (Unless he had in mind an extremely broad sense for “sex”, which would include e.g. self-masturbation.)

Comment author: DanArmak 08 September 2012 08:13:06PM 1 point [-]

Maybe he was just moralizing and wanted to label short or paid-for sexual intimacy as "mere sex".

Comment author: [deleted] 08 September 2012 08:59:58PM 4 points [-]

By looking at the pyramid, I think he meant for "sexual intimacy" to be to "sex" as friendship is to conversation, i.e. by the former he meant what people today would call "being in a relationship" or "romance". But I'm not fully sure.

Comment author: DanArmak 08 September 2012 09:09:55PM 1 point [-]

You mean the function of guaranteeing availability? Having friends provides good conversation. Being in a relationship provides good sex.

And being free from worry about having to provide conversation or sex for tomorrow satisfies a psychological need for security. That makes sense.