Benja comments on How to cheat Löb's Theorem: my second try - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (25)
Wei Dei asked me in email:
Good point and I don't have an answer yet, but while thinking about it it's occurred to me that AI_Q2 with PA instead of PA(n) might be equivalent to Giles' idea.
(The PA(n) stuff in your definition of AI_Q2 doesn't seem to me to add much to the idea -- it's obviously more powerful than using PA, but using PA(omega) is obviously more powerful than using PA(n), so. [ETA: cf. also this discussion.])
If the two really are equivalent, then Giles' idea seems to me to make clearer what is actually happening, and it feels to me like an instance of the parametric polymorphism trick -- maybe my version just isn't the best way to apply the trick to AI. So if I can't quickly find an example where my version does better, I think maybe I'll just table the issue, keep both versions in mind, start working on the next slightly more complex toy problem, and see what turns out to be useful...
[By "quickly find", I mean in much less than 3^^^3 steps.]