Psychohistorian comments on Conventions and Confusing Continuity Conundrums - Less Wrong

2 Post author: Psy-Kosh 01 May 2009 01:41AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (9)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 01 May 2009 06:29:17AM 3 points [-]

If a dust speck in the eye is worse than nothing, and being tortured for 50 years is worse than a dust speck, there must be some probability of being tortured for 50 years which is so small that you are indifferent between that and a certainty of getting a dust speck in the eye? I quite agree!

See you at Penguicon...

Comment author: Psychohistorian 01 May 2009 12:36:53PM 2 points [-]

The actual effort it requires to consider which option to take is itself probably less pleasant than just taking the dust speck. Of course, this decision cost doesn't apply to models, but it's worth considering if you're thinking of actually being faced with the decision yourself.