Maybe he trusts himself to see when things are getting risky, and having a share buys him leverage over the direction of the company.
Alternatively, he simply thinks of SIAI's stuff as important background research to have in place, but doesn't think we're anywhere near building AGI anytime soon.
http://techcrunch.com/2012/08/21/vicarious-good-ventures-funding/
Discussion on Hacker News
Meta: this is my first post here, let me know if I am doing something wrong or if I shouldn't post this here.