shminux comments on The noncentral fallacy - the worst argument in the world? - Less Wrong

157 Post author: Yvain 27 August 2012 03:36AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (1742)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: shminux 14 September 2012 08:43:12PM *  0 points [-]

reliably predicting future experiences E2 in a range of contexts C (as C approaches infinity) consistent with the past experiences E1 which led me to to put X in my model in the first place.

I wholeheartedly approve of this approach. If more people used it, we would avoid the recurrent unproductive discussions of QM interpretations, qualia and such.

EDIT. Just to clarify, the part saying "put X in my model" is the essential bit to preempt the discussion of "but does it exist outside your model?", since the latter would violate this definition of "exist". such as this statement by our esteemed Kaj Sotala:

why those beings actually have qualia, and don't merely act like it.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 14 September 2012 08:56:36PM *  0 points [-]

Oh, I very much doubt that. But I'd like to think so.

EDIT: I wrote the above before your edit, and don't really understand your edit.

Comment author: Peterdjones 03 October 2012 10:10:30AM 0 points [-]

Instrumentalism is pretty unproductive when it comes to answering questions about what really exists.