MugaSofer comments on The noncentral fallacy - the worst argument in the world? - Less Wrong

157 Post author: Yvain 27 August 2012 03:36AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (1742)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: gwern 19 December 2012 10:47:58PM 0 points [-]

Which, while of some minor historical significance, is not considered mainstream science AFAIK.

Alchemy was far more mainstream than, say, 'chemistry'.

The gay president would be Buchanan, and as for conspiracy theorists, well, that's the shortest summary. See http://www.gwern.net/Mistakes#the-american-revolution

Comment author: MugaSofer 19 December 2012 11:13:32PM -2 points [-]

Alchemy in general, yes. But Newton was less than generous with his science at the best of times; with the already secretive alchemy, he wasn't exactly publishing peer-reviewed articles.

Thanks for the history trivia :)

Comment author: gwern 19 December 2012 11:43:37PM 0 points [-]

Well come on, it's not like Newton's alchemy was noticeably more nonsensical than regular alchemy!