RomeoStevens comments on What is the evidence in favor of paleo? - Less Wrong

13 Post author: jsteinhardt 27 August 2012 07:07AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (96)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: siodine 27 August 2012 03:40:30PM 4 points [-]

The most obvious, and significant, argument in favor of paleo is that it tends to make it more difficult to overeat or maintain a lot of weight (i.e., it's acts as a fail-safe against akrasia). Imagine if you only had nuts, fruits, and vegetables to snack on and for anything else you had to cook a meal.

A better diet would be to push your eating window to 2-3pm to 10pm (intermittent fasting), and only eat low calorie things which you've cooked (and make sure you don't buy anything that can be eaten without being cooked).

Basically, from the research I've read, akrasia is the most significant factor in maintaining a healthy weight; anything you can do to force or impel your future self to commit to your non-akrasiac desires is a good idea.

Comment author: RomeoStevens 29 August 2012 10:14:00PM *  0 points [-]

Snacking generally leads to drastically underestimating calories consumed. I've found eating 3 big meals in an 8 hour window to be best for me.

Comment author: jsteinhardt 30 August 2012 07:42:29AM 0 points [-]

Isn't that what siodine suggested? (Or were you agreeing with him.)

Comment author: RomeoStevens 30 August 2012 09:02:54AM 0 points [-]

Agreeing. Just adding to the idea.