Stuart_Armstrong comments on Counterfactual resiliency test for non-causal models - Less Wrong

21 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 30 August 2012 05:30PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (78)

Sort By: Best

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: MaoShan 22 September 2012 03:27:28AM 0 points [-]

Don't you agree that Moore's law is the only trustworthy part of their models, though?

Comment author: Stuart_Armstrong 22 September 2012 03:34:54PM 0 points [-]

Simply pointing out that it's not just the quantity of the data that matters, but other factors too.