SoullessAutomaton comments on Open Thread: May 2009 - Less Wrong

4 Post author: steven0461 01 May 2009 04:16PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (204)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: SoullessAutomaton 02 May 2009 01:43:05AM *  0 points [-]

Why do you think it should be free? And why would that offset the inefficiencies inherent in a massive public system?

Is there any evidence that massive systems are efficient no matter who is running them? Government-run utilities don't seem to do worse, and the USA health care system is demonstrably less efficient than many countries' public systems.

Comment author: mattnewport 02 May 2009 09:22:08AM 0 points [-]

Government-run utilities don't seem to do worse,

Can you give an example? All the government run utilities that come to mind are disasters. There are probably examples of government run utilities that are efficient but I'm having trouble thinking of any.

Comment author: CronoDAS 02 May 2009 03:17:09PM 0 points [-]

My local town provides unusually good garbage collection service. An attempt by the borough council to save money by hiring private contractors for garbage collection was met by many, many outraged people showing up to the council meeting to protest.

Comment author: mattnewport 02 May 2009 09:03:53PM 0 points [-]

Efficient implies cost-effective: government run garbage collection might be a reasonably high quality service but come at an unreasonably high price. It sounds like cost concerns were the motivation for the change in your example.

Comment author: CronoDAS 02 May 2009 09:07:45PM 0 points [-]

The protesters made it very clear that they preferred to pay more for the higher level of service.

Comment author: mattnewport 02 May 2009 09:16:58PM 0 points [-]

But since this is a government run monopoly they don't have that choice as individuals so instead they have to take political action.