common_law comments on Dealing with trolling and the signal to noise ratio - Less Wrong

22 Post author: JoshuaZ 31 August 2012 01:26PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (231)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: common_law 02 September 2012 04:07:40AM 16 points [-]

Reading troll comments has negative utility. Replying to a troll means causing that loss of utility to each reader who wants to read the reply (times the probability that they read the troll when reading the reply)

That's exactly the kind of consideration that should lead people to downvote responses to "trolls." If you think someone is stupidly "feeding trolls," you should downvote them.

It seems that E.Y. is miffed that readers aren't punishing troll feeders enough and that he's personally limited to a single downvote. As an end-run around this sad limitation, he seeks to multiply his downvote by 6 by instituting an automatic penalty for this class of downvotable comment.

Nothing is so outrageously bad about troll feeding that it can't be controlled by the normal means of karma allocation. The bottom line is that readers simply don't mind troll feeding as much as E.Y. minds it; otherwise they'd penalize it more by downvotes. E.Y. is trying to become more of an autocrat.

Comment author: [deleted] 02 September 2012 08:43:57AM 3 points [-]

Thank you. The last paragraph perfectly articulates why I disagree with this feature.

Comment author: Pentashagon 02 September 2012 06:33:44AM 0 points [-]

It sounds like the real fix is a user-defined threshold. Anyone who only likes the highest rated comments can browse at +3 or whatever, and anyone who isn't bothered by negatively rated comments can browse at a lower threshold.

Comment author: [deleted] 02 September 2012 08:42:19AM 5 points [-]

Isn't it already there?

Comment author: Alicorn 02 September 2012 06:27:42PM 2 points [-]

Yep.

Comment author: Pentashagon 03 September 2012 08:13:25AM 0 points [-]

Thanks, I had only looked on the article's page for something like the "sort by" dropdown, but found the setting in the preferences.

Comment author: [deleted] 03 September 2012 10:26:26PM -1 points [-]

(Now, if it also hid replies to downvoted comments in the Recent Comments page, it'd fully solve the ‘problem’, IMO.)