Desrtopa comments on Rationality Quotes September 2012 - Less Wrong

7 Post author: Jayson_Virissimo 03 September 2012 05:18AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (1088)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Desrtopa 01 September 2012 08:54:43PM 19 points [-]

It is an example of the system working as it should!

Really, it's an example of the system backfiring,causing someone to upvote a comment that deserved a downvoting it would probably otherwise have received.

Comment author: RomanDavis 01 September 2012 10:17:36PM 2 points [-]

That was my point.

Comment author: Viliam_Bur 03 September 2012 08:33:42AM -2 points [-]

What probability do you assign to someone with total karma less than 5 coming and translating this specific Will_Newsome's comment into intelligible speach? My estimate is: epsilon.

Breaking a rule, and explaining that it has to be done to provide an opportunity for something with epsilon probability and a very low value even if it happened... that's just an example of a person deliberately breaking a rule, and signalling dissatisfaction with the rule.

Comment author: Alicorn 03 September 2012 08:34:57AM *  10 points [-]

People respond to incentives. Especially loss-related incentives. I do not give homeless people nickels even though I can afford to give a nearly arbitrary number of homeless people nickels. The set of people with karma less than five will be outright unable to reply - the set of people with karma greater than five will just be disincentivized, and that's still something.