army1987 comments on Rationality Quotes September 2012 - Less Wrong

7 Post author: Jayson_Virissimo 03 September 2012 05:18AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (1088)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 07 September 2012 10:13:35PM 1 point [-]

approximately $1 to $3 per elector

Is that that little? I think many fewer people would vote if they had to pay $3 out of their own pocket in order to do so.

If they're effectively conscripted (them not being allowed to refuse), not really "hired" -- that would imply they don't need to be paid a lot...

A law compelling people to do stuff would be very unpopular, unless they get adequate compensation. Not paying them much would just mean they would feign illness or something. (If they didn't select people by lot, the people doing that would be the ones applying for that job, who would presumably like it more than the rest of the population and hence be willing to do that for less.)

Comment author: ArisKatsaris 07 September 2012 10:26:12PM 0 points [-]

I think many fewer people would vote if they had to pay $3 out of their own pocket in order to do so.

Well perhaps fewer people would vote if they had to pay a single cent out of their own pocket -- would that mean that 0.01$ isn't little either?

A law compelling people to do stuff would be very unpopular, unless they get adequate compensation.

How much are these Italian ballot-counters being paid? Can we quantify this?

Comment author: [deleted] 07 September 2012 10:31:05PM 0 points [-]

IIRC, something like €150 per election. I'll look for the actual figure.