Incorrect comments on Rationality Quotes September 2012 - Less Wrong

7 Post author: Jayson_Virissimo 03 September 2012 05:18AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (1088)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 08 September 2012 08:41:56AM 24 points [-]

The following quotes were heavily upvoted, but then turned out to be made by a Will Newsome sockpuppet who edited the quote afterward. The original comments have been banned. The quotes are as follows:

If dying after a billion years doesn't sound sad to you, it's because you lack a thousand-year-old brain that can make trillion-year plans.

— Aristosophy

One wish can achieve as much as you want. What the genie is really offering is three rounds of feedback.

— Aristosophy

If anyone objects to this policy response, please PM me so as to not feed the troll.

Comment author: Incorrect 08 September 2012 06:27:10PM 3 points [-]

If dying after a billion years doesn't sound sad to you, it's because you lack a thousand-year-old brain that can make trillion-year plans.

If only the converse were true...

Comment author: Hawisher 17 September 2012 02:04:16AM 0 points [-]

"...if you lack a thousand-year-old brain that can make trillion-year plans, dying after a billion years doesn't sound sad to you"?

I'm confused as to what you're trying to say. Are you saying that dying after a billion years sounds sad to you?

Comment author: nshepperd 17 September 2012 04:08:31AM 2 points [-]

"If you lack a thousand-year-old brain that can make trillion-year plans, it's because dying after a billion years doesn't sound sad to you."

I think meaning it's unfortunate that thinking that dying after a billion years is sad doesn't by itself give you the power to live that long. Maybe.

Comment author: Hawisher 17 September 2012 05:28:39PM 0 points [-]

I was never one for formal logic, but isn't that the contrapositive? I was under the impression that the converse of p then q was q then p.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 18 September 2012 02:04:35AM 1 point [-]

I was under the impression that the converse of p then q was q then p.

Yes and that's what nshepperd wrote.

Comment author: Hawisher 18 September 2012 07:27:27PM 0 points [-]

Oh wow, never mind. My brain was temporarily broken. Is it considered bad etiquette here to retract incorrect comments?

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 19 September 2012 04:15:41AM 1 point [-]

When you retract the comment is simply struck-through not deleted, so no.

Comment author: Incorrect 17 September 2012 04:19:29AM 1 point [-]

Are you saying that dying after a billion years sounds sad to you?

And therefore you would have a thousand-year-old brain that can make trillion-year plans.

Comment author: MugaSofer 01 October 2012 11:58:44AM 0 points [-]

Seems legit.