Vaniver comments on Rationality Quotes September 2012 - Less Wrong

7 Post author: Jayson_Virissimo 03 September 2012 05:18AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (1088)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vaniver 11 September 2012 07:56:30PM 8 points [-]

Fortunately for him, Buddhism is cleverly designed to contain no scientifically falsifiable claims.

A Buddhist friend told me that at a class in a temple, the teacher mentioned four types of creation, of which one was spontaneous generation- like maggots spontaneously generating in meat. My friend interrupted to say that, no, that's not actually what happens, and that people did experiments to prove that it didn't happen. (My friend was too polite to mention that the experiments were 350 years old.) If I remember correctly, the teacher said something like "huh, okay," and went on with the lesson, leaving out any parts relevant to spontaneous generation.

Comment author: gwern 11 September 2012 08:01:23PM 0 points [-]

That's an unfortunate example. The teacher should have amended his maggot example to 'the first living cell', then.

Comment author: Vaniver 11 September 2012 08:03:51PM *  3 points [-]

Traditional Spontaneous generation and modern abiogenesis are very different things, and comments that assume the first may be invalid if only the second is true.

Comment author: gwern 11 September 2012 08:24:53PM 2 points [-]

They may have differences... but are they any that matter for that Buddhist typology of creation?