CharlesR comments on How to tell apart science from pseudo-science in a field you don't know ? - Less Wrong

18 Post author: kilobug 02 September 2012 10:25AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (70)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Rhwawn 03 September 2012 12:50:41AM 4 points [-]

To the best of my knowledge (and I've looked) there is not a single scientific long-term randomized study showing the effectiveness of any type of treatment for autism.

Why isn't there? There would seem to have been more than enough time & funding for at least one. Is there some more subtle problem here?

(I'm thinking a scenario like "parents of autistic kids are constantly trying new approaches both quack and genuine, and would refuse to stop this, thereby making the results worthless; and this is foreseeable in advance by any would-be experimenters.")

Comment author: CharlesR 03 September 2012 10:33:15AM *  0 points [-]

No one wants to be in the control group.

Comment author: Rhwawn 05 September 2012 03:19:13PM 1 point [-]

Do you know that, or are you guessing?