Chris_Roberts comments on Cryonics: Can I Take Door No. 3? - Less Wrong

5 Post author: Chris_Roberts 05 September 2012 03:49PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (111)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 05 September 2012 08:05:26PM *  8 points [-]

If you don't believe in an afterlife, then it seems you currently have two choices...

Believing in afterlife doesn't grant you one more option. This is a statement about ways of mitigating or avoiding death, and beliefs are not part of that subject matter. An improved version of the statement would say, "If there is no afterlife, then...". In this form, it's easier to notice that since it's known with great certainty that there is no afterlife, the hypothetical isn't worth mentioning.

Comment author: Chris_Roberts 06 September 2012 12:38:16PM *  0 points [-]

True. Believing doesn't grant more options, but if you truly believe in an afterlife, then this is not a question that would concern you: you believe you have a better option. :)

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 06 September 2012 06:33:31PM 1 point [-]

If you believe in an afterlife, the question that concerns you is still whether there is an afterlife, not whether you believe in an afterlife. So you still should worry about the hypothetical of there being an afterlife, which you'd assign more probability, not about the hypothetical of you believing in an afterlife.

Comment author: Chris_Roberts 07 September 2012 12:16:25PM 0 points [-]

If you believe in an afterlife, the question that concerns you is still whether there is an afterlife, not whether you believe in an afterlife.

I think we are assigning different meanings to "believe". In my sense, a true believer has no doubt, so "whether" is no longer a question. I think we may be getting sidetracked on semantics, though.