Irgy comments on Jews and Nazis: a version of dust specks vs torture - Less Wrong

16 Post author: shminux 07 September 2012 08:15PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (151)

Comments (151)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: shminux 07 September 2012 09:16:13PM *  0 points [-]

It is also a bad sign if you invoke TWAITW. If you check the law, as stated on Wikipedia, it does not cover my post:

"As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1."

The Reductio ad Hitlerum attempts to refute a view because it has been held by Hitler.

You can sort of make your case that it is covered by one of the Corollaries:

Godwin's law applies especially to inappropriate, inordinate, or hyperbolic comparisons of other situations (or one's opponent) with Nazis.

except for the proposed amendment:

Adam Gopnik has proposed an amendment to Godwin's Law. Called 'Gopnik's Amendment', he argues that comparisons to the Nazis is justified if the individual or association embrace a world-view that contains the three characteristics of nationalism, militarism, and hatred of otherness (that includes but is not limited to anti-Semitism).

Which is exactly what I was doing (well, one out of three, so not exactly).

Comment author: orthonormal 07 September 2012 09:24:50PM *  5 points [-]

As discussed there, pointing out that it has this feature isn't always the worst argument in the world. If you have a coherent reason why this argument is different from other moral arguments that require Godwin's Law violations for their persuasiveness, then the conversation can go forward.

EDIT: (Parent was edited while I was replying.) If "using Jews and Nazis as your example because replacing them with Venusians and Neptunians would fail to be persuasive" isn't technically "Godwin's Law", then fine, but it's still a feature that correlates with really bad moral arguments, unless there's a relevant difference here.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit