Alicorn comments on Call for Anonymous Narratives by LW Women and Question Proposals (AMA) - Less Wrong

20 [deleted] 09 September 2012 08:39AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (364)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Dreaded_Anomaly 15 September 2012 06:39:44AM 1 point [-]

In the context of Epiphany's post, these aren't arbitrary guys:

the ones who do seem good have problems like the above

Comment author: Alicorn 15 September 2012 06:43:26AM 2 points [-]

I don't think I would enjoy a prolonged period of having to manage someone's desperation on the expectation that there is an otherwise functional guy under all of it. Plenty of guys come functional out of the package, so the opportunity cost of a lot of dysfunction-fussing-with is high. But your advice could be good for people who like fixer-uppers; it's probably safer and more productive than trying to tame a sociopath or something.

Comment author: Dreaded_Anomaly 15 September 2012 07:14:15AM 3 points [-]

Plenty of guys come functional out of the package, so the opportunity cost of a lot of dysfunction-fussing-with is high.

Well, this conversation has managed to go right around in a circle:

From their perspective, you (as a woman in a largely-male group) have many more romantic prospects than they do.

Also, turning "dig a little deeper" into "a prolonged period" seems uncharitable.

Comment author: Alicorn 15 September 2012 04:12:00PM 0 points [-]

Well, yes. I do in fact have many more romantic prospects than a bunch of the guys I know. Should I act like that is false?

Also, turning "dig a little deeper" into "a prolonged period" seems uncharitable.

Prolonged beyond what is enjoyable, or required for me to achieve a comfortable level of confidence that it's not going to become enjoyable soon.