cata comments on Meta: LW Policy: When to prohibit Alice from replying to Bob's arguments? - Less Wrong

-3 Post author: SilasBarta 12 September 2012 03:29AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (81)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: cata 12 September 2012 07:19:34AM *  17 points [-]

Never. Either warn Alice, ban Alice, or leave it alone. Attempting to give Alice an Internet restraining order is only going to cause her to find more roundabout ways of expressing her views (e.g. dragging the conflict into other threads.) Just keep it simple.

Comment author: Jayson_Virissimo 12 September 2012 08:58:00AM 3 points [-]

Never. Either warn Alice, ban Alice, or leave it alone. Attempting to give Alice an Internet restraining order is only going to cause her to find more roundabout ways of expressing her views (e.g. dragging the conflict into other threads.) Just keep it simple.

Even more simple: If Bob doesn't like Alice's reply, then Bob should downvote Alice's reply.

Comment author: khafra 12 September 2012 07:23:31PM 1 point [-]

Schelling was in favor of a graduated scale of punishments in The Strategy of Conflict; either by smaller degrees of punishment, or a smaller possibility of a large punishment.

That seems to be most lacking part of his analysis of bargaining tactics, historically speaking. Many historians think that strategy made the Vietnam War worse than it had to be.

But is there any formal principle behind purposefully allowing yourself to carry out only a single type of punishment?