katydee comments on Meta: LW Policy: When to prohibit Alice from replying to Bob's arguments? - Less Wrong

-3 Post author: SilasBarta 12 September 2012 03:29AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (81)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: komponisto 12 September 2012 11:10:27AM 9 points [-]

For obvious reasons, participants in a personal feud should not have moderator powers.

Comment author: katydee 12 September 2012 12:18:51PM 0 points [-]

What if someone gets into a feud with Eliezer? Does he have to step down? This doesn't seem like a very practical rule.

Comment author: fezziwig 12 September 2012 01:55:45PM 13 points [-]

I took it to mean, "should not have moderator powers with respect to their feud". If Eliezer and some other guy are fighting, Eliezer's not allowed to ban that guy not matter how badly he behaves - he has to prevail on e.g. lukeprog to do it.

Comment author: SilasBarta 12 September 2012 04:27:58PM *  0 points [-]

Additionally, he should not pick moderators over which he has unusually high influence -- for an extreme example, if he's the dominatrix (atror?) for that moderator. (I don't know if that applies to lukeprog, but I'm pretty sure it doesn't...)

Comment author: komponisto 12 September 2012 12:39:53PM *  4 points [-]

I will note that the rule I intended was not "no Less Wrong moderator shall ever be involved in a conflict with another human being". Crucial details of the present situation are that (1) SilasBarta is himself a prominent and respectable member of the LW community, with exactly 7700 karma at the time of writing; and (2) Alicorn's issue with him originated on LW and predates Alicorn's being made a moderator.

So we're not talking about a situation where e.g. some troll with a longstanding feud with EY from outside LW comes onto the site to make trouble.

Comment author: SilasBarta 12 September 2012 05:16:11PM 2 points [-]

Per fezzwig, it just means, "Hey, other moderator, I'm not close enough to impartial here, so look at this thread and make the judgment on it."

That would mean that if moderator A nobly "avoided" getting another moderator, but then picked a moderator B, over which A has unusual influence, and did it precisely "when it actually mattered [to A]", that would also not be kosher.