novalis comments on The Rosenhan Experiment - Less Wrong

3 Post author: chaosmosis 14 September 2012 10:31PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (20)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: novalis 15 September 2012 05:37:51PM 3 points [-]

Things are not entirely different.

Here's another one

(Note that the main thing you'll find when you search for replications is Lauren Slater's book. Don't trust it; she won't share any evidence and has a history of lying).

Comment author: MixedNuts 15 September 2012 06:08:01PM 2 points [-]

First link: Patients were psychiatric nurses, faking specific illnesses during their whole stay. (Rosenhan had various people faking atypical symptoms until admission.) Doctors believing them aren't to blame.

Among the findings of the project were that patients frequently found it difficult to get information on their treatment

Agrees with my experience. A computer for patients and access to Crazy Meds help, but I don't know an easy fix for less geeky patients.

Second link: That's a pretty good test. However, the doctors were shown patients who had been treated and were doing well. It's harder to diagnose short-sightedness if your patient is wearing contact lenses.

So neither of these tests are nearly as stringent as Rosenhan's.