Nisan comments on Open Thread, September 15-30, 2012 - Less Wrong

7 Post author: OpenThreadGuy 15 September 2012 04:41AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (206)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Epiphany 26 September 2012 05:25:31AM *  5 points [-]

I think this is worth it's own post but in light of my last discussion catching fire and burning to the ground, I have decided to request a critique on this one before posting in discussions:

<begin discussion post proposition>

Cryonics Moral Dilemma

Since joining LessWrong, I've been thinking about cryo a lot, and have encountered a dilemma:

According to GiveWell, "We estimate that giving a few thousand dollars to AMF likely saves a person's life." (They do malaria bed nets if you're not familiar).

Cryo costs tens of thousands of dollars, and it's not guaranteed to save even one life.

I don't see how I would ever justify signing up, myself, unless I show that I'm capable of making a large enough difference in the world that rescuing my difference making abilities justifies the risk and cost.

This also means "Reddit, help me find some peace I'm dying young" is a cute puppy dog cause. :/

Does anyone relate? What are your thoughts?

<end discussion post proposition>

please critique the proposed discussion post

Comment author: Nisan 26 September 2012 09:42:06AM *  4 points [-]

This idea has been covered on Less Wrong before. I'll spend the next minute looking up some links.

EDIT: Years saved: Cryonics vs VillageReach
Against Cryonics & For Cost-Effective Charity
There's already discussion about cryonics and charitable giving in the Reddit, help me find some peace I'm dying young thread.
There is a discussion thread in Normal Cryonics about charity vs. cryonics. See in particular this comment.

Comment author: Epiphany 28 September 2012 09:55:43PM 0 points [-]

Wow okay. I didn't expect to find such good arguments. I am still not adjusted to the intelligence level here. Well, different new discussion idea then.