RobertLumley comments on Less Wrong Polls in Comments - Less Wrong

79 Post author: jimrandomh 19 September 2012 04:19PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (302)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: RobertLumley 19 September 2012 04:28:04PM 12 points [-]

After my vote:

" Mean 43.5 Median 75.0 Total votes 2"

Well this is mathematically impossible... My guess is the median isn't properly calculated for even numbers of votes.

Comment author: DaFranker 19 September 2012 04:34:50PM 8 points [-]

...trolltastic.

"Mean 1.25e+18 Median 45.0 Total votes 8"

Comment author: siodine 19 September 2012 04:56:27PM 7 points [-]

Specifying a lower and upper bound on the input should be required.

Comment author: ema 21 September 2012 02:35:30PM 1 point [-]

That doesn't really prevent trolling, so i'm not sure that it would be helpful.

Comment author: siodine 21 September 2012 04:42:59PM 3 points [-]

It won't prevent trolling but it will minimize its effects. As it stands, you can input numbers like 1e+19 which will seriously throw off the mean. If trolls can only give the highest or lowest reasonable bound then they're not going to have much of an effect individually and that makes going through the effort to troll less worthwhile.

Comment author: jimrandomh 19 September 2012 04:56:16PM 10 points [-]

Thanks for spotting this! I looked into it, and it seems to be double-counting the most recent result when computing the median. It's an order-of-initialization issue; it thinks it's getting all the results except the new one, adding it, then taking the median, but it's actually getting a list of all the results. The fix is straightforward; I'll email the admins to apply it.

Comment author: wmoore 19 September 2012 11:48:23PM 3 points [-]

Your fix for the incorrect median calculation has been deployed.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 20 September 2012 12:30:56PM 2 points [-]

I got a mean of -9.91765890411e+16, so something is still wrong.

Comment author: Kindly 20 September 2012 01:25:18PM 11 points [-]

No, that's unfortunate but correct (several people entered things like entered -3e+18 as their estimate).

Comment author: Kawoomba 21 September 2012 05:33:03PM *  1 point [-]

Well this is mathematically impossible...

Not necessarily:

Votes: 12 and 75

Mean: 43.5

Median (upper median): 75

While the standard e.g. wolfram alpha definition (which isn't normative) of the median would be 43.5 as well, it is an accepted practice (in plenty of CS grad classes, at least) to have the median guaranteed to be an element of the sample, normally the upper median is then chosen simply as "median". Hence the wiki definition having the qualifier "usual".

In fact, I was surprised that the median is strictly speaking not guaranteed to be an element of the set, using the majority mathematical definition.

So, not so much an error as a lazy CS convention ...