TheOtherDave comments on New study on choice blindness in moral positions - Less Wrong

73 Post author: nerfhammer 20 September 2012 06:14PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (151)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 21 September 2012 08:44:09PM 3 points [-]

IIRC, questions that were scored as "uncorrected" were those that, even after debriefing, subjects did not identify as swapped.
So if Q1 is scored as uncorrected, part of what happened is that I gave answer A to Q1, it's swapped for B, I explained why I believe B, I was afterwards informed that some answers were swapped and asked whether there were any questions I thought that was true for, even if I didn't volunteer that judgment at the time, and I don't report that this was true of Q1.
If I'm only pretending to have an opinion (B) that's not mine about Q1, the question arises of why I don't at that time say "Oh, yeah, I thought that was the case about Q1, since I actually believe A, but I didn't say anything at the time."

As I say, though, it's certainly possible... I might continue the pretense of believing B.