MaoShan comments on New study on choice blindness in moral positions - Less Wrong

73 Post author: nerfhammer 20 September 2012 06:14PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (151)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: simplicio 21 September 2012 11:22:38PM 16 points [-]

One of the most audacious and famous experiments is known informally as "the door study": an experimenter asks a passerby for directions, but is interrupted by a pair of construction workers carrying an unhinged door, concealing another person whom replaces the experimenter as the door passes. Incredibly, the person giving directions rarely notices they are now talking to a completely different person. This effect was reproduced by Derren Brown on British TV (here's an amateur re-enactment).

I think the response of the passerby is quite reasonable, actually. Confronted with a choice between (a) "the person asking me directions was just spontaneously replaced by somebody different, also asking me directions," and (b) "I just had a brain fart," I'll consciously go for (b) every time, especially considering that I make similar mistakes all the time (confusing people with each other immediately after having encountered them). I know that this is probably not a phenomenon that occurs at the conscious level, but we should expect the unconscious level to be even more automatic.

Comment author: MaoShan 24 September 2012 02:05:27AM *  22 points [-]

...Confronted with a choice between (a) "the person asking me directions was just spontaneously replaced by somebody different, also asking me directions," and (b) "I just had a brain fart," I'll consciously go for (a) every time, especially considering that I observe similar phenomena all the time (people spontaneously replacing each other immediately after having encountered them). ...

I'm curious, why do you take that view?

Comment author: simplicio 24 September 2012 11:50:04AM 10 points [-]

Missed it on the first read-through, heh. Excellent try.

Comment author: [deleted] 24 September 2012 10:28:01PM 3 points [-]

I didn't notice until I read Swimmer963's comment. I did remember reading its parent and did remember that it said something sensible, so when I read the altered quotation I thought I had understood it to be ironic.

Comment author: Swimmer963 24 September 2012 03:05:53AM 3 points [-]

Am I the only one who's really confused that this comment is quoting text that is different than the excerpt in the above comment?

Comment author: Alejandro1 24 September 2012 03:43:45AM 10 points [-]

Shhhhh! You're ruining the attempt at replication!

Comment author: RobFisher 29 September 2012 08:02:31AM 0 points [-]

I didn't notice at first, but only because I did notice that you were quoting the comment above which I had just read and skipped over the quote.