jimmy comments on New study on choice blindness in moral positions - Less Wrong

73 Post author: nerfhammer 20 September 2012 06:14PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (151)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: simplicio 21 September 2012 11:22:38PM 16 points [-]

One of the most audacious and famous experiments is known informally as "the door study": an experimenter asks a passerby for directions, but is interrupted by a pair of construction workers carrying an unhinged door, concealing another person whom replaces the experimenter as the door passes. Incredibly, the person giving directions rarely notices they are now talking to a completely different person. This effect was reproduced by Derren Brown on British TV (here's an amateur re-enactment).

I think the response of the passerby is quite reasonable, actually. Confronted with a choice between (a) "the person asking me directions was just spontaneously replaced by somebody different, also asking me directions," and (b) "I just had a brain fart," I'll consciously go for (b) every time, especially considering that I make similar mistakes all the time (confusing people with each other immediately after having encountered them). I know that this is probably not a phenomenon that occurs at the conscious level, but we should expect the unconscious level to be even more automatic.

Comment author: jimmy 24 September 2012 08:57:56PM 5 points [-]

What a coincidence, this happened to me with your comment! I originally read your name as "shminux" and was quite surprised when I reread it.

If there's some coding magic going on behind the scenes, you've got me good. But I'm sticking with (b) - final answer.

Comment author: shminux 24 September 2012 10:23:07PM 3 points [-]

originally read your name as "shminux" and was quite surprised when I reread it.

For the record, I fully endorse simplicio's analysis :)