Argency comments on Any existential risk angles to the US presidential election? - Less Wrong

-9 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 20 September 2012 09:44AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (213)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 20 September 2012 07:31:03PM *  7 points [-]

To use a specific example: I think that the Tea Party does a better job of convincing their lazy supporters to vote than either of the major parties do, and if we accept that logic then the inescapable conclusion is that the Tea Party's influence is being inflated by America's non-compulsory voting system.

You do know tea party activists are actually above average on nearly any stat you'd care to name? Education, political knowledge, ...

Just look at Konkvistador - surely LWians and their ilk are the people we want MOST to vote?

Well sure! Any plan on a revolution to make sure only we vote? Because otherwise a very eloquent Church pastor or Harvard professor can single-handedly bring more voting power to bear than we.