Argency comments on Any existential risk angles to the US presidential election? - Less Wrong

-9 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 20 September 2012 09:44AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (213)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 21 September 2012 04:59:23AM *  -2 points [-]

His policy is radical and I disagree with it,

What's wrong with being "radical"?

I agree that Beck has a tendency to use let's say "evocative rhetoric" that would certainly not pass muster on LW.

This president I think has exposed himself over and over again as a guy who has a deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture....I'm not saying he doesn't like white people, I'm saying he has a problem. This guy is, I believe, a racist.

What exactly is so "lunatic" about this quote? Yes, the reasoning isn't up to LW standards, but that's true of nearly all reasoning outside LW.

I'm thinking about killing Michael Moore, and I'm wondering if I could kill him myself, or if I would need to hire somebody to do it. ... No, I think I could. I think he could be looking me in the eye, you know, and I could just be choking the life out. Is this wrong? I stopped wearing my What Would Jesus -- band -- Do, and I've lost all sense of right and wrong now. I used to be able to say, 'Yeah, I'd kill Michael Moore,' and then I'd see the little band: What Would Jesus Do? And then I'd realize, 'Oh, you wouldn't kill Michael Moore. Or at least you wouldn't choke him to death.' And you know, well, I'm not sure.

He is by no means the only public personality to fantasize about killing a prominent member of the opposing political faction.

I don’t think we came from monkeys. I think that’s ridiculous. I haven’t seen a half-monkey, half-person yet.

I disagree with him, but you may want to read this before deciding that this is obviously "lunatic".

I can't be bothered writing up a summary of his conspiracy theories, but it's worth googling his Caliphate theory.

Near as I can tell, this theory stripped of the flowery language boils down to the prediction that the Muslim spring uprising will result in theocratic Islamic governments that will attempt to impose Islamic theocracy on the rest of the world to the best of their abilities. Well, in light of recent events this prediction is looking increasingly probable.

Wait, did I just get punk'd? Was this a serious reply that I responded to? I'm genuinely wondering, I'm not trying to make fun of you. Poe's Law and all that.

Let me guess, this is the first time you've been in a discussion with someone whose political views are vastly different from your own.