CronoDAS comments on [SEQ RERUN] Why Does Power Corrupt? - Less Wrong

4 Post author: MinibearRex 22 September 2012 04:35AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (2)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: CronoDAS 23 September 2012 10:40:54AM 5 points [-]

There doesn't need to be a special mechanism for power to corrupt; normal reinforcement learning should work perfectly well. When you're corrupt, you take actions to benefit yourself instead of those you're supposed to be benefiting. And if those actions do indeed benefit yourself, well, then, that's obviously the kind of thing that reinforcement learning is designed to teach you to do. You take the bribe, or set up a harem, or whatever, because being corrupt means that you are doing things that feel good to you (and are therefore reinforcing) instead of things that benefit the rest of the group.

It's easy to say you won't give into temptation when you've never been tempted before, but it's a lot harder to say that and also be right.

Comment author: TheAncientGeek 09 October 2016 12:18:50PM *  0 points [-]

There's another mechanism which is a bit more like paperclipping: rulers come up with random ideas, which they think are doing good because their yes-men say so. (Example]. So you have two mechanisms, one which can go anywhere, and one which converges onto a narrow set of features, such as having multiple sexual partners. In view of the second mechanism, it becomes clear what a great piece of social technology the idea of an Official Opposition is.