If we didn't have politics, we'd raid each others' villages and steal the women and sheep instead. Politics is a way to avoid direct bloodshed, and as such is an improvement.
Back when I was studying political science at university, warfare, terrorism, etc... were explicitly considered forms of politics ("politics by other means"). At risk of sounding simplistic, the alternative to non-unanimous decision procedures (the realm of political society) is unanimous decision procedures (the realm of civil society).
At risk of sounding simplistic, the alternative to non-unanimous decision procedures (the realm of political society) is unanimous decision procedures (the realm of civil society).
Or living without using decision procedures at all, which is quite feasible in small groups under ~150 people. There will always be disagreement about "rights" and the like, but small groups can more easily hash out such disagreements through informal ethics (i.e. managed de-escalation of conflict). Political conflict persay only seems to arise in larger groups.
Original at Washington Examiner
http://washingtonexaminer.com/down-with-politics/article/2508882#.UGSscI0iYZm
Repost at Reason.com
http://reason.com/archive/2012/09/25/why-politics-are-bad-for-us