Peterdjones comments on The Useful Idea of Truth - Less Wrong

77 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 02 October 2012 06:16PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (513)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: shminux 02 October 2012 06:31:53AM 1 point [-]

Since my expectations sometimes conflict with my subsequent experiences, I need different names for the thingies that determine my experimental predictions and the thingy that determines my experimental results. I call the former thingies 'beliefs', and the latter thingy 'reality'.

You ought to admit that the statement 'there is "the thingy that determines my experimental results"' is a belief. A useful belief, but still a belief. And forgetting that sometimes leads to meaningless questions like "Which interpretation of QM is true?" or "Is wave function a real thing?"

Comment author: Peterdjones 02 October 2012 08:31:55PM *  1 point [-]

You ought to admit that the statement 'there is "the thingy that determines my experimental results"' is a belief.

Why? Didn;t anyone ever see results that conflict with their beliefs?

Comment author: shminux 02 October 2012 09:15:56PM 0 points [-]

Yes... and...? Feel free to explicate the missing steps between what I wrote and what you did.

Comment author: Peterdjones 03 October 2012 09:03:26AM 1 point [-]

So what was it that conflicted with their beliefs, when they saw a result that conflicte with their beliefs?