Well, if the universe actually runs on a computer, then presumably that computer includes data for all stars, not just the ones that are visible to us.

If the universe doesn't run on a computer, then you have to actually digitize the universe so that your model is identical to the real universe as if it were on a computer, not stop halfway when it gets too hard or physically impossible.

I don't think any of these principles will actually be practical. Even the sense-experience principle isn't useful. It would classify "a particle accelerator the size of the Milky Way would generate evidence of photinos" as meaningful, but no one is going to build a particle accelerator the size of the Milky Way any more than they are going to digitize the universe. The goal is to have a philosophical tool, not a practical plan of action.