wedrifid comments on "Hide comments in downvoted threads" is now active - Less Wrong

18 Post author: Wei_Dai 05 October 2012 07:23AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (87)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 05 October 2012 10:48:51AM 9 points [-]

I have no particular antipathy toward either Wei Dai or wedrifid, nor did I allow myself to develop a particular attachment to either "side" in that particular controversy, given that the appearance of "sides" at all didn't strike me as particularly productive.

Not productive in the slightest. In fact I would happily downvote my own comment (despite reflectively endorsing it) just to hide the entire pointless load of tripe.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 05 October 2012 09:26:03PM 1 point [-]

Yep, there's some of my own comments I wish I could downvote for the same reason.

Comment author: wedrifid 05 October 2012 09:55:38PM *  1 point [-]

Yep, there's some of my own comments I wish I could downvote for the same reason.

Really? This is a little surprising but only in a purely logistical sense. You don't tend to be in situations where that can be effective. Voting on your comments is more extreme than with most so whenever your comments form part of an unproductive conversation they already tend to be downvoted way below the threshold where less prominent users who draw less attention may only have reached -2 or -3. For this reason I suspect the current implementation handles this for you with requiring your noble self-sacrifice.

(Pardon me if I'm just being too literal and you meant "would wish to be able to downvote". The prominence and popularization factor is just what popped into my head following the "that would be redundant" thought.)

Comment author: thomblake 08 October 2012 08:08:27PM 0 points [-]

there's some of my own comments I wish I could downvote

Me too. And that was even a feature of the system, once upon a time. But I'm not bitter, no.

Comment author: maia 05 October 2012 02:48:41PM 1 point [-]

This is likely the point of the rule: to discourage otherwise-high-quality comments that might inspire a wave of crappy ones.

Comment author: prase 07 October 2012 04:50:19PM 3 points [-]

The problem seemed to be that a crappy comment can sometimes inspire a wave of good comments.