LessWrong help desk - free paper downloads and more

36 Post author: jsalvatier 07 October 2012 11:45PM

Over the last year, VincentYu, gwern, myself and others have provided 132 academic papers for the LessWrong community (out of 152 requests, a 87% success rate) through the Free research, editing and articles thread. We originally intended to provide editing, research and general troubleshooting help, but article downloads are by far the most requested service.

If you're doing a LessWrong relevant project we want to help you. If you need help accessing a journal article or academic book chapter, we can get it for you. If you need some research or writing help, we can help there too.

Turnaround times for articles published in the last 20 years or so is usually less than a day. Older articles often take a couple days.

Please make new article requests in the comment section of this thread.

If you would like to help out with finding papers, please monitor this thread for requests. If you want to monitor via RSS like I do, Google Reader will give you the comment feed if you give it the URL for this thread (or use this link directly). 

If you have some special skills you want to volunteer, mention them in the comment section.

Comments (734)

Sort By: Controversial
Comment author: ChrisHallquist 25 February 2013 02:32:40AM -1 points [-]
Comment author: VincentYu 02 March 2013 04:15:56AM 1 point [-]
Comment author: ChrisHallquist 04 December 2013 07:01:06AM *  0 points [-]

Report from the FDA's Sugards Task Force, 1986 (Link is to first four pages.)

EDIT: Resolved via /r/scholar/

Comment author: gwern 04 December 2013 11:31:08PM 2 points [-]

Are you sure this is a journal publication and not an entire book? http://www.worldcat.org/title/report-from-fdas-sugars-task-force-1986-evaluation-of-health-aspects-of-sugars-contained-in-carbohydrate-sweeteners/oclc/153620633 suggests it's a book, and I don't see any hits in Google Scholar for a Journal of Nutrition paper covering it, and from your PDF, 1000 citations sounds like it would take up a lot of space.

Comment author: ChrisHallquist 05 December 2013 03:23:32AM 0 points [-]

Special issue of a journal, apparently. I ended up getting the executive summary via /r/scholar so it's resolved.

Comment author: lukeprog 02 May 2013 06:10:58PM *  2 points [-]

Requested here, and found.

Comment author: lukeprog 21 April 2013 09:47:38PM 0 points [-]
Comment author: lukeprog 02 May 2013 05:56:58PM *  2 points [-]

Requested here, and found.

Comment author: lukeprog 24 February 2013 05:31:50AM 0 points [-]
Comment author: boredstudent 25 February 2013 08:42:50AM 2 points [-]
Comment author: lukeprog 24 February 2013 05:31:15AM 0 points [-]
Comment author: VincentYu 02 March 2013 04:04:55AM 2 points [-]
Comment author: lukeprog 24 February 2013 05:23:12AM 0 points [-]
Comment author: beriukay 24 February 2013 09:08:28AM 3 points [-]
Comment author: lukeprog 24 February 2013 09:43:28AM 1 point [-]

Thanks again!

Comment author: lukeprog 21 February 2013 02:04:32PM 0 points [-]
Comment author: chemotaxis101 21 February 2013 03:40:35PM 1 point [-]
Comment author: lukeprog 21 February 2013 03:26:36AM 0 points [-]
Comment author: boredstudent 21 February 2013 03:54:09AM 2 points [-]
Comment author: lukeprog 21 February 2013 04:39:33AM -1 points [-]

Thanks!

Comment author: lukeprog 23 January 2013 07:57:19PM 0 points [-]
Comment author: jsalvatier 23 January 2013 08:18:56PM 2 points [-]
Comment author: lukeprog 23 January 2013 08:48:18PM 1 point [-]

Thanks!

Comment author: lukeprog 30 January 2013 09:30:05AM 4 points [-]

sigh. I guess somebody is systematically downvoting all my comments again, if even this comment gets a downvote. :(

Comment author: Larks 10 February 2013 04:18:27PM -1 points [-]

It's those damn karma intrinsic egalitarians who bite the bullet on the Levelling Down Objection.

Comment author: lukeprog 17 January 2013 04:54:44AM 0 points [-]
Comment author: gwern 17 January 2013 05:12:27AM 1 point [-]
Comment author: lukeprog 17 January 2013 02:46:51AM 0 points [-]
Comment author: gwern 17 January 2013 03:30:53AM 1 point [-]
Comment author: lukeprog 17 January 2013 04:20:38AM -1 points [-]

Oh you're right, they've got the same DOI number, just different titles.

Comment author: lukeprog 14 January 2013 03:05:00AM 0 points [-]
Comment author: VincentYu 17 January 2013 12:03:58PM 1 point [-]
Comment author: ChrisHallquist 18 November 2012 07:24:23PM 0 points [-]
Comment author: VincentYu 18 November 2012 11:13:33PM 1 point [-]
Comment author: ChrisHallquist 18 November 2012 07:23:09PM 0 points [-]
Comment author: VincentYu 18 November 2012 11:13:50PM 1 point [-]
Comment author: David_Gerard 08 October 2012 06:44:14AM 13 points [-]

I note, by the way, that /r/scholar is also an excellent place to ask for papers. I've seen (and had) requests I thought near-impossible answered within an hour.

Comment author: protest_boy 12 November 2013 01:50:47AM *  -1 points [-]
Comment author: protest_boy 13 November 2013 08:35:50PM 1 point [-]
Comment author: ChrisHallquist 28 October 2013 01:17:21AM -1 points [-]
Comment author: gwern 28 October 2013 02:18:22AM 2 points [-]
Comment author: ChrisHallquist 28 October 2013 04:18:16AM -1 points [-]

That's... odd. I picked up this issue at the airport, and there was a much longer cover story in there. Maybe this is actually the short introduction to the longer cover story?

Comment author: gwern 28 October 2013 04:31:07PM 0 points [-]

Entirely possible. But that will make it a lot harder to collect all the stories, because you need to find titles for each of them before anyone can retrieve them from a database. This is one of the situations where you may be best off just biting the bullet and buying or borrowing a copy or visiting your local library (which presumably gets Times).

Comment author: protest_boy 13 October 2013 01:20:14AM -1 points [-]

Narratives and goals: Narrative structure increases goal priming. Laham, Simon M.; Kashima, Yoshihisa http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/zsp/44/5/303/

Comment author: VincentYu 13 October 2013 06:27:01PM 3 points [-]
Comment author: gwern 29 June 2013 05:30:08PM 1 point [-]

"A Preliminary Report of Kayak-Angst Among the Eskimo of West Greenland: a Study in Sensory Deprivation" http://isp.sagepub.com/content/9/1/18.extract

Comment author: VincentYu 06 July 2013 04:33:08AM 1 point [-]
Comment author: gwern 23 June 2013 08:16:17PM *  1 point [-]
  1. 'Lithium in drinking water and the incidences of crimes, suicides, and arrests related to drug addictions', Schrauzer & Shrestha 1990 http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02990271
  2. "The mathematical relationship of drinking water lithium and rainfall to mental hospital admission" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5497853
  3. "Relationship of lithium metabolism to mental hospital admission and homicide" http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4648454
Comment author: VincentYu 25 June 2013 07:49:24PM *  1 point [-]

2. Here.
3. Here.

Comment author: VincentYu 24 June 2013 04:38:04AM 2 points [-]
  1. Here.
  2. Requested.
  3. Requested.
Comment author: ChrisHallquist 11 May 2013 06:11:56AM -1 points [-]

Edmundson, R.H. (1990), Decomposition: a strategy for judgmental forecasting. Journal of Forecasting, 9, 301-314.

Comment author: VincentYu 15 May 2013 11:11:03AM 1 point [-]
Comment author: gwern 19 April 2013 05:12:46PM 1 point [-]
Comment author: VincentYu 05 May 2013 01:32:23AM 1 point [-]
Comment author: jsalvatier 20 April 2013 10:05:39PM 2 points [-]

Requested.

Comment author: gwern 18 April 2013 07:03:17PM 1 point [-]
Comment author: jsalvatier 20 April 2013 09:55:28PM 2 points [-]
Comment author: lukeprog 17 April 2013 10:43:48PM 1 point [-]
Comment author: VincentYu 05 May 2013 01:33:56AM 2 points [-]
Comment author: jsalvatier 20 April 2013 09:55:09PM 2 points [-]

requested

Comment author: jsalvatier 20 April 2013 09:37:10PM *  2 points [-]

These links make it hard to find the article because for me to go to the wiley login page. If you link to 'abstract' it works fine though.

Comment author: lukeprog 20 April 2013 09:47:56PM 1 point [-]
Comment author: ChrisHallquist 16 April 2013 03:41:00PM -1 points [-]
Comment author: jsalvatier 20 April 2013 09:55:40PM 2 points [-]
Comment author: DaFranker 16 April 2013 03:57:18PM 1 point [-]

What's wrong with this one? (second "external link" on the page you linked) It's on the author's site, along with many (all?) of his other papers.

If you want it in formatted PDF though, only Springer has it afaict, so someone else will have to help you there.

Comment author: lukeprog 19 March 2013 04:28:49PM 1 point [-]
Comment author: jsalvatier 29 March 2013 02:41:25AM 2 points [-]

here apologies about the delay.

Comment author: jsalvatier 24 March 2013 09:46:43PM 2 points [-]

Requested.

Comment author: ModusPonies 15 March 2013 02:26:52PM *  1 point [-]

I was halfway through writing a post asking for this paper, but remembered to Google first and it turns out gwern already has that covered. Thanks!

(The result of my research: creatine is probably a good nootropic only if you are a vegetarian. This is valuable information, since I am a vegetarian.)

Comment author: gwern 15 March 2013 03:08:22PM *  1 point [-]
Comment author: paulfchristiano 27 February 2013 08:18:33PM 1 point [-]
Comment author: boredstudent 28 February 2013 04:24:27AM 5 points [-]
Comment author: gwern 27 February 2013 10:43:48PM 2 points [-]
Comment author: ChrisHallquist 25 February 2013 02:34:10AM -1 points [-]
Comment author: VincentYu 02 March 2013 04:06:17AM 1 point [-]
Comment author: ChrisHallquist 25 February 2013 02:33:27AM -1 points [-]
Comment author: Elithrion 05 March 2013 03:59:07AM 2 points [-]

http://dl.dropbox.com/s/hlcx9p04vrdnr0z/74477090-120823160907-phpapp01.pdf (Incidentally, the full text was the first result on google search.)

Comment author: ChrisHallquist 07 March 2013 02:55:53PM -1 points [-]

Thanks for letting me know about it coming up on Google. I had searched for it on Google Scholar getting the url I posted, but re-searching this looks like a case where plain Google works better than Google Scholar. Doesn't usually happen, but I'll keep it in mind in the future.

Comment author: ChrisHallquist 23 February 2013 04:16:54AM -1 points [-]
Comment author: boredstudent 23 February 2013 05:17:37PM 1 point [-]
Comment author: boredstudent 21 February 2013 01:19:10AM *  5 points [-]

This site is the best for academic papers: http://libgen.org/scimag

Seriously. Look at their list of available journals. They claim to have access to 21M papers.

Comment author: lukeprog 13 February 2013 08:57:38PM 1 point [-]
Comment author: jsalvatier 13 February 2013 11:31:00PM 2 points [-]

requested.

Comment author: boredstudent 13 February 2013 11:28:22PM 3 points [-]
Comment author: ChrisHallquist 12 January 2013 09:35:23AM -1 points [-]

Peter Norvig. 2008. Statistical learning as the ultimate agile development tool. ACM 17th Conference on Information and Knowledge.

Comment author: jsalvatier 20 January 2013 08:41:26PM 1 point [-]

I found this presentation by Norvig that has that name, but not a paper by that name, despite finding the "ACM 17th Conference on Information and Knowledge Management". Is that what you meant? Couldn't find "ACM 17th Conference on Information and Knowledge".

Comment author: ChrisHallquist 06 January 2013 05:28:54PM -1 points [-]
Comment author: gwern 06 January 2013 06:42:54PM 1 point [-]
Comment author: ChrisHallquist 03 January 2013 10:08:37AM -1 points [-]

http://wcx.sagepub.com/content/20/1/99.short

This is a case where Google scholar claims to have a PDF, but the link to the PDF is not working for me.

Comment author: jsalvatier 03 January 2013 05:09:47PM 2 points [-]
Comment author: ChrisHallquist 03 January 2013 09:57:36AM -1 points [-]
Comment author: jsalvatier 03 January 2013 05:11:04PM 2 points [-]
Comment author: ChrisHallquist 03 January 2013 09:56:27AM -1 points [-]
Comment author: gwern 03 January 2013 05:46:42PM 1 point [-]
Comment author: ChrisHallquist 03 January 2013 09:52:46AM -1 points [-]
Comment author: jsalvatier 03 January 2013 05:12:37PM 1 point [-]
Comment author: ChrisHallquist 03 January 2013 09:45:25AM -1 points [-]
Comment author: jsalvatier 20 January 2013 08:32:19PM 2 points [-]
Comment author: jsalvatier 03 January 2013 05:13:21PM 1 point [-]

Requested.

Comment author: ChrisHallquist 03 January 2013 09:44:39AM -1 points [-]
Comment author: gwern 03 January 2013 05:43:25PM 2 points [-]
Comment author: jsalvatier 03 January 2013 05:14:58PM 2 points [-]
Comment author: ChrisHallquist 01 January 2013 03:24:04PM -1 points [-]

Neufeld, V. R., Norman, G. R., Barrows, H. S., & Feightner, J.W. (1981). Clinical problem solving by medical students: A longitudinal and crosssectional analysis. Medical Education, 15 , 315–322.

Comment author: jsalvatier 20 January 2013 08:31:25PM 2 points [-]
Comment author: jsalvatier 02 January 2013 08:01:43PM 1 point [-]

Requested.

Comment author: ChrisHallquist 01 January 2013 03:18:23PM *  -1 points [-]

Feltovich, P. J., & Barrows, H. S. (1984). Issues of generality in medical problem solving. In H. G. Schmidt & M. L. DeVolder (Eds.), Tutorials in problem-based learning. Assen, the Netherlands: Van Gorcum.

Comment author: jsalvatier 20 January 2013 08:31:08PM 2 points [-]
Comment author: jsalvatier 02 January 2013 08:20:17PM 2 points [-]

Requested.

Comment author: ChrisHallquist 27 December 2012 06:32:46PM -1 points [-]

Putnam, Hilary, 1961. “Brains and Behavior”, originally read as part of the program of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Section L (History and Philosophy of Science), December 27, 1961.

Comment author: jsalvatier 02 January 2013 08:22:14PM 2 points [-]
Comment author: jsalvatier 29 December 2012 10:19:46PM 1 point [-]

Requested.

Comment author: ChrisHallquist 26 December 2012 04:06:32PM -1 points [-]

John Searle's 1980 paper Minds, Brains, and Programs. I'm requesting this because the version that comes up on Google Scholar is labeled as an "unedited penultimate draft," which is a problem for purposes of quoting it directly.

Comment author: jsalvatier 28 December 2012 01:31:13AM 2 points [-]
Comment author: ChrisHallquist 28 December 2012 04:18:46PM -1 points [-]

Huzzah!

Comment author: ChrisHallquist 16 December 2012 07:12:47PM -1 points [-]
Comment author: VincentYu 17 December 2012 04:03:56AM 1 point [-]
Comment author: ChrisHallquist 09 December 2012 09:59:11AM -1 points [-]

I'm not sure how "LessWrong relevant" philosophy of religion is considered to be, but I could use having access to the section on Aquinas from William Lane Craig's book The Cosmological Argument from Plato to Leibniz.

Comment author: jsalvatier 22 December 2012 02:33:59AM 1 point [-]

I generally have trouble getting access to books sorry :-/

Comment author: ChrisHallquist 27 December 2012 03:38:09PM -1 points [-]

Thanks anyway :)

Comment author: ChrisHallquist 26 November 2012 09:25:14AM -1 points [-]
Comment author: VincentYu 26 November 2012 11:19:35AM 1 point [-]
Comment author: gwern 24 November 2012 02:08:03AM 1 point [-]

(If anyone knows a general way to get theses when the obvious download fails, I'd appreciate knowing. They seem pretty hard to get.)

Comment author: jsalvatier 24 November 2012 08:09:22PM 2 points [-]

Yeah, I've had difficulty accessing theses as well. My roommate tells me that the reason is that nobody wants to access them because they're almost always just a set of previously published papers (in many fields you publish 3 papers and staple them together for a thesis). This suggests the alternative of finding the papers that make up the thesis. You'll miss out on the introduction by the author, but they may be a lot easier to get a hold of.

Comment author: gwern 24 November 2012 10:23:44PM 1 point [-]

That works sometimes, but not usually for the theses I seem to be interested in - for example, the iodine thesis has no preceding papers or else I would've found those first before running into the thesis.

Comment author: VincentYu 24 November 2012 02:47:04PM 1 point [-]
  • I couldn't access the first thesis.

  • Second thesis. Hmm... unfortunately, the author ignored the past two decades of research using the Big Five and relied instead on personality typing.

(I think recent theses from most US institutions are available from the ProQuest database. I don't know any general way to get non-US theses.)

Comment author: gwern 24 November 2012 05:23:59PM 1 point [-]

Thanks for the second; there's actually a surprising number of papers using MBTI in online education, it's really annoying. I may have to look into converting MBTI to Big Five if I do a meta-analysis.

Comment author: lukeprog 23 November 2012 11:42:36PM 2 points [-]

Goode, P. (2002). Connecting with the reservoir. Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association Journal, 42(2).

According to Welsh et al. (2002), this paper estimates that "biases such as anchoring and overconfidence contribute to a US$30 billion/year loss in the oil and gas industry."

Comment author: VincentYu 28 November 2012 05:15:25PM *  1 point [-]

Here.

Unfortunately, the $30 billion/year loss is not explained and no citation is given:

Pivotal to improving recovery will be making better decisions throughout field life. Such decisions can only be based on having accurate and current information, from both wells and facilities. However, today’s experience with such data is a barrier. If gathered at all, data are usually incomplete and often remains unverified and, therefore, unused.

Experts estimate that, as an industry, we waste roughly 25%—or approximately US$30 billion—of our annual upstream expenditures.

Providing timely access to integrated, reliable, verified data, information and knowledge is crucial to the effective decision-making that will ensure optimal exploitation of an asset.

Our poor experience with using large volumes of data in our industry is slowing the uptake of new technology that can offer significant benefits. The barriers grow when we confront changing our established work processes aso that we can move to the necessary level of interdisciplinary integration.

Comment author: gwern 28 November 2012 06:48:18PM 2 points [-]

Experts estimate that, as an industry, we waste roughly 25%—or approximately US$30 billion—of our annual upstream expenditures.

One possible attack for a citation is, besides the obvious searches for those two figures or looking for related government reports/statistics, is looking for a McKinsey report on that industry written before then; they're widely read but not always cited, and they have industry-wide views because of their prestige and numerous clients.

Comment author: VincentYu 24 November 2012 02:16:00PM 1 point [-]

Requested.

Comment author: ChrisHallquist 19 November 2012 05:43:35PM -1 points [-]
Comment author: jsalvatier 20 November 2012 02:42:46AM 2 points [-]
Comment author: ChrisHallquist 19 November 2012 12:30:16PM -1 points [-]
Comment author: VincentYu 19 November 2012 04:41:13PM 1 point [-]

PMed.

Comment author: ChrisHallquist 08 November 2012 08:50:05AM -1 points [-]
Comment author: VincentYu 08 November 2012 09:14:05AM 1 point [-]
Comment author: ChrisHallquist 08 November 2012 08:43:52AM -1 points [-]
Comment author: VincentYu 08 November 2012 09:13:50AM 1 point [-]
Comment author: ChrisHallquist 08 November 2012 08:40:29AM -1 points [-]

Mollick, Ethan. "Establishing Moore's law." Annals of the History of Computing, IEEE 28.3 (2006): 62-75.

Comment author: VincentYu 08 November 2012 09:13:34AM 1 point [-]
Comment author: ChrisHallquist 07 November 2012 08:20:12PM -1 points [-]
Comment author: VincentYu 07 November 2012 08:49:13PM 1 point [-]
Comment author: VincentYu 29 October 2012 10:57:19PM *  1 point [-]

Comment author: jsalvatier 06 November 2012 06:38:57PM 1 point [-]

Finally, Here

Comment author: jsalvatier 31 October 2012 12:38:36AM 1 point [-]

Requested.

Comment author: gwern 18 October 2012 02:47:26AM *  1 point [-]

I'm looking for a thesis by Bullock 2007, "Experiments on partisanship and public opinion: Party cues, false beliefs, and Bayesian updating" (may be accessible via Proquest).

I'm interested in it because I've come up with a Bayesian justification of the backfire effect, but it seems like Bullock may have covered it already in the last section. ;_;

EDIT: He did some interesting stuff in "Part 3, Bayesian Updating of Political Beliefs: Normative and Descriptive Properties", but not exactly what I have in mind.

Comment author: VincentYu 18 October 2012 07:55:13AM 3 points [-]
Comment author: Cyan 14 October 2012 05:09:12AM *  1 point [-]

I need some guidance with a problem in the calculus of variations. I want to use direct methods to prove the existence of a minimizer of a certain functional, but I don't really know what I'm doing. If anyone with expertise is reading, I've given a full description at MathOverflow.

Comment author: Cyan 14 October 2012 05:11:03PM 1 point [-]
Comment author: VincentYu 19 October 2012 07:13:25PM 1 point [-]

You can download the book here.

Comment author: AlexSchell 12 October 2012 07:41:30PM *  2 points [-]

PDFs of the following books are available upon request (I will likely send you a link by next business day):


Kahnemann, Slovic, Tversky, eds. (1982) Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases

Howson & Urbach (2006) Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach 3rd ed.

Thaler & Sunstein (2008) Nudge


Elliott Sober (2008) Evidence and Evolution

Huw Price (1997) Time's Arrow and Archimedes' Point


James Stewart (2011) Calculus: Early Transcendentals 7th ed.


Craig & Moreland, eds. (2009) The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology

Jordan Howard Sobel (2009) Logic and Theism

Graham Oppy (2006) Arguing About Gods

Neil A. Manson, ed. (2003) God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science


Madigan et al. (2010) Brock Biology of Microorganisms 13th ed.

Comment author: amcknight 10 October 2012 10:34:30PM 1 point [-]

Churchland, Paul M., State-space Semantics and Meaning Holism in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research JStor Philosophy Documentation Center

Comment author: VincentYu 11 October 2012 09:18:16AM 3 points [-]
Comment author: Michelle_Z 09 October 2012 07:44:25PM *  2 points [-]

For the editing. How could I sign up to help? I don't have the skills in research yet, but I am decent at writing and could help.

Comment author: jsalvatier 11 October 2012 10:12:46AM *  1 point [-]

Thanks for the offer Michelle! Either 1 - monitor these comments and wait for someone to ask for help (I use RSS to do that) or 2 - I can remember that you offered to help and can let you know when someone offers.

Unfortunately, we've only had a few requests for that kind of help. I might use it in a while, though.

Comment author: Pablo_Stafforini 09 October 2012 03:31:13PM *  6 points [-]

I have a big library of about 5,000 pdf's, with books (including textbooks) and papers in philosophy, psychology, statistics, computer science and a few other areas. The library is about 18 GB in size. If folks here can think of an easy way of sharing this material, I'd be happy to make it publicly available.

Comment author: Michelle_Z 09 October 2012 04:01:59PM 0 points [-]

Google drive. It can be set so that a folder is only available to someone if you send them the link. If there isn't enough room on one account, make a couple different accounts and separate them by subject.

Comment author: Pablo_Stafforini 09 October 2012 04:27:54PM *  1 point [-]

Thanks. Unfortunately Google Drive offers 5 GB of space only. Yes, in principle I could create four different accounts, but in practice this would be a hassle, since ideally I would want to keep the library updated and this would require me to switch accounts frequently. It would also be harder for visitors to access the material, since I really lack the time to sort thousands of files into separate subjects. I might consider this approach if there are no other options, but I'd strongly prefer to upload all the files to a single account.

A possible alternative: I could send people here invites to Dropbox and earn additional storage space. If sufficient folks sign up (~25), this would provide me with enough space to upload all of this material.

Comment author: Pablo_Stafforini 29 November 2012 02:55:33AM *  5 points [-]

I've made a number of updates over the past weeks, so I thought I should write a brief new comment summarizing the material that is now available for download. There are two separate torrent files, both of which contain the entirety of my electronic library, comprising about 4,100 items mostly in pdf format.

One torrent contains all the files uncompressed. You can see the contents of the library and select specific files for downloading. Magnet URI:

magnet:?xt=urn:btih:BEDDF7A5647B634C179EA68EBBBAAA80967D9D1D&dn=LessWrong&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3a80%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.publicbt.com%3a80%2fannounce

The other torrent contains a single, compressed file, which is about 20% smaller in size. Choose this one if you want to download the entire library. Magnet URI:

magnet:?xt=urn:btih:1D845DB543FFF3DE83B66FAA595F1A3D9F42ED42&dn=Library.zip&tr=udp%3a//tracker.openbittorrent.com%3a80/announce

Comment author: roland 29 November 2012 04:09:20PM 1 point [-]

Thanks a lot!

Comment author: roland 04 November 2012 02:01:14PM 1 point [-]

Is there a way to download individual contents without downloading the whole 15 Gb zip file?

Comment author: Morendil 08 October 2012 06:42:41AM 3 points [-]

I have subscriptions to both ACM and IEEE. Just sayin'.

Comment author: beriukay 16 November 2012 01:16:41AM 2 points [-]

Paper 9 has just been posted.

Comment author: Pablo_Stafforini 09 October 2012 03:18:36PM *  6 points [-]
Comment author: Clarity 14 May 2015 02:21:46AM *  0 points [-]

this was an unhelpful comment, removed and replaced by the comment you are now reading

Comment author: VincentYu 14 May 2015 06:56:39AM 0 points [-]

Chapter 3 is available from the publisher as a sample.

(BTW, this is an old help desk thread; the newest one is here.)

Comment author: Emily 30 June 2014 09:35:25AM 0 points [-]

Is this page still active? My institution doesn't have access to the journal Psychophysiology going back far enough... would anyone be able to find this:

Fischler, I. et al. "Brain potentials related to stages of sentence verification." Psychophysiology 20(4), 400--409.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1983.tb00920.x/pdf

Thanks very much!

Comment author: gwern 30 June 2014 03:38:39PM 3 points [-]

Is this page still active?

Most people would be looking at newer threads like http://lesswrong.com/lw/ji3/lesswrong_help_desk_free_paper_downloads_and_more/

Comment author: Emily 01 July 2014 09:06:31AM 0 points [-]

Ah, thanks, I didn't spot that there were more recent ones.

Comment author: Emily 30 June 2014 10:21:48AM 1 point [-]

Update: obtained from another source.

Comment author: RomeoStevens 05 February 2014 12:23:27PM 0 points [-]

Two requests:

Shelf life and safety concerns of bakery products--a review. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15077880

Predicting and preventing mold spoilage of food products. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23462093

Comment author: VincentYu 16 February 2014 07:58:24AM 3 points [-]
Comment author: RomeoStevens 16 February 2014 09:19:45AM 0 points [-]

YES! thank you. These are super helpful.

Comment author: gwern 06 February 2014 05:23:02PM 0 points [-]

(I can't get either, sorry.)

Comment author: RomeoStevens 06 February 2014 06:01:45PM 0 points [-]

Thanks for trying.

Comment author: gwern 14 January 2014 01:34:42AM 0 points [-]

Greene LS. "A retrospective view of iodine deficiency, brain development, and behavior from studies in Ecuador". In: Stanbury JB, ed. The Damaged Brain of Iodine Deficiency. New York, NY: Cognizant Communication; 2004:173-185.

Comment author: VincentYu 23 January 2014 06:14:54AM 1 point [-]
Comment author: gwern 24 January 2014 08:21:04PM 0 points [-]

Thanks.

Comment author: VincentYu 17 January 2014 07:16:24AM 1 point [-]

Requested.

Comment author: Larks 09 December 2013 04:20:40PM 0 points [-]
Comment author: gwern 09 December 2013 05:56:13PM 3 points [-]
  1. http://www.econ.wayne.edu/agoodman/5550/week1/HE_2011.pdf
  2. http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/cutler/files/health_aff-2013-cutler-841-50.pdf

The first one can be found by searching the title in Google Scholar. The second one can be found the same way but the Harvard PDF link in GS is currently broken; I re-searched the title in regular Google, which led me to another Harvard page with a fresh PDF download link.

Comment author: Larks 17 December 2013 07:46:22PM 1 point [-]

Sorry for not finding them myself; that is embarrassingly easy.

Comment author: gwern 17 December 2013 09:32:44PM 1 point [-]
Comment author: gwern 28 November 2013 07:04:33PM 0 points [-]
Comment author: VincentYu 30 November 2013 11:03:54PM 2 points [-]
Comment author: gwern 30 November 2013 11:33:02PM 0 points [-]

Thanks.

Comment author: RomeoStevens 21 October 2013 05:32:16PM 0 points [-]

Converting relative risks to absolute risks: A graphical approach http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sim.4780080603/abstract

Comment author: VincentYu 01 December 2013 11:29:06PM 3 points [-]
Comment author: gwern 21 October 2013 06:15:12PM 0 points [-]

(I can't get it.)

Comment author: RomeoStevens 21 October 2013 07:28:11PM 0 points [-]

Thank you for trying.

Comment author: gwern 12 October 2013 05:32:34PM 0 points [-]
Comment author: VincentYu 13 October 2013 06:26:47PM 2 points [-]
Comment author: gwern 13 October 2013 11:54:00PM 0 points [-]

Thanks.

Comment author: gwern 11 October 2013 03:12:13AM 0 points [-]
Comment author: VincentYu 01 December 2013 11:28:42PM 2 points [-]
Comment author: gwern 01 December 2013 11:37:02PM 1 point [-]

Thanks.