moshez comments on Beware Trivial Inconveniences - Less Wrong

90 Post author: Yvain 06 May 2009 10:04PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (108)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: kragensitaker 11 August 2011 08:56:38PM 2 points [-]

Well, but unlike the atom-cooling example, becoming a strict vegetarian doesn't cut off your communication with non-vegetarians.

It does make it more difficult to go to the steakhouse with them, or eat over at their house.

Comment author: moshez 31 December 2012 11:51:57AM 2 points [-]

For eating at people's houses: usually people will have enough side-dishes that if one does not make a big deal of it, one can fill up on non-meat dishes. At worst, there's always bread.

For going to steakhouse -- yes, but at every other place, there's usually a vegetarian option, if one tries hard enough.

It does make a good case for being an unannoying vegetarian...but being a strict-vegetarian is a useful Schelling point.

Comment author: fubarobfusco 29 March 2013 05:26:24PM 2 points [-]

These lines of thinking seem to be a pretty big rationalization risk. Does human political behavior really act like cooling atoms? Sure, if thinking that way makes me feel good about my political choices!

Comment author: TimS 29 March 2013 07:48:57PM 0 points [-]

These lines of thinking seem to be a pretty big rationalization risk.

I agree with this, but am confused by your criticism of the evaporative cooling metaphor. Rationalization and mechanisms for a group to become more extreme are not the same topic.

Comment author: fubarobfusco 30 March 2013 04:14:47AM 0 points [-]

I wasn't responding to the evaporative-cooling metaphor.