Eliezer_Yudkowsky comments on Causal Reference - Less Wrong

30 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 20 October 2012 10:12PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (242)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 21 October 2012 04:00:24AM 17 points [-]

PA proves "2 + 2 = 4" using the associative property. PA does not prove "2 + 2 = 3". "2 + 2 = 4" is actually shorthand for "((1+1) + (1+1)) = (((1+1)+1)+1)". Moving stuff next to other stuff in our universe happens to follow the associative property; this is why the belief is useful.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 21 October 2012 06:14:34AM 5 points [-]

(I like that! The idea that it follows just from the associative property and no other features of PA is quite elegant.)