army1987 comments on Causal Reference - Less Wrong

30 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 20 October 2012 10:12PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (242)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 25 October 2012 06:26:35PM 2 points [-]

I don't think anyone takes seriously the way standard physics models the beginning of time (temperature and density of the universe approaching infinity as its age approaches zero), anyway, as it's most likely incorrect due to quantum gravity effects.

Comment author: wedrifid 25 October 2012 10:21:14PM 0 points [-]

I don't think anyone takes seriously the way standard physics models the beginning of time (temperature and density of the universe approaching infinity

This is a correct usage of terminology but the irony still made me smile.

Comment author: [deleted] 26 October 2012 12:35:45AM 1 point [-]

What?

Comment author: RobbBB 09 June 2013 11:10:18PM 1 point [-]

I think wedrifid is pointing to the irony in saying that the 'standard' model is (on some issue) standardly rejected.